Madison debates whether petition would ban all rentals | State

MADISON — If past Wednesday’s Madison Planning Board conference is any sign, a cloud of uncertainty hovers over what could possibly occur if a petition on short-term rentals passes at the polls March 8. Just one principle is it would ban not only STRs but also extensive-term leasing in town.

Showing at the Feb. 2 assembly were STR critics Nick Borelli, John Cancelarich, Paul McKenna and Nordel Gagnon.

Borelli and fellow Eidelweiss resident Kathy Koziell experienced offered the petitioned write-up, and setting up board member David Cribbie had previously mentioned he thinks the article, if handed, would have the impact of restricting long-phrase renting.

“The scheduling board at its community hearing on that petitioned write-up voted unanimously not to assistance it simply because some associates have been worried that the way it was composed would eradicate all likely suitable to lease your property,” mentioned Chair Marc Ohlson, who was then reminded by Cribbie that selectmen’s consultant Josh Shackford experienced really voted to advocate the article. 

Shackford at the Jan. 25 selectmen’s assembly insisted the warrant posting would not affect prolonged-phrase housing. “I never consider for a next that would ban extended-time period rentals,” he mentioned.

The other two selectmen, Bill Lord and Michael Mauro, didn’t supply an belief. 

Previous setting up board alternate Jay Buckley, who was not long ago elevated to whole membership, said he agreed with Cribbie that the “wording would ban all rentals.”

In Borelli and Koziell’s posting, the definition of “dwelling device” bans “transient occupancies” these as resorts, motels … or “similar short-time period lodging accommodations to paying out company for as very little as a single evening.” 

Cancelarich for the duration of community remark disagreed the petitioned short article would prohibit prolonged-time period leasing. He mentioned that the zoning ordinance previously contains a definition of transient occupancy as meaning leasing for 30 times or fewer.

“I would suggest you to converse to your attorney so … she arrives up with an precise interpretation of what this unique write-up would do,” he explained.

Borelli says the short article would have the result of restricting STRs to industrial locations and prohibiting them in household neighborhoods that have been disrupted with sound and website traffic from small-time period renters. He and other folks deny that it would limit prolonged-term renting. 

Meanwhile, Cancelarich also questioned the organizing board’s proposed definition of short-expression rental and what effects it would have on the town if voters adopted it in March. 

“It can be just a definition,” replied Ohlson. “It really is not a regulation.”

New Hampshire could add civics exam to college requirements

Madison debates whether petition would ban all rentals

The definition claims, “Quick-phrase rentals implies a non-proprietor-occupied residential dwelling device where by transient lodging with sleeping lodging for less than 16 occupants is presented for compensation for stays of any duration concerning 1 and 30 consecutive evenings and in which the dwelling unit would typically be regarded as a household residing unit not linked with a controlled commercial exercise these types of as but not constrained to hotels, motels or bed-and-breakfasts.”

Ohlson mentioned if passed this calendar year, the definition would simply sit on the textbooks right up until such time voters go new laws that reference the STR definition.

The proposed definition is meant to do the job in tandem with a planning board proposed regulation that would permit shorter-expression rentals by exclusive exception from the ZBA.

Nonetheless, the regulation will not be brought forward considering that, as planners earlier explained, the STR regulation was not appropriately discovered for Dec. 1.

Gagnon reported brief-term rentals are producing difficulties in Eidelweiss. He mentioned STR homeowners are complaining about other STR house owners, and he will not see how making it possible for STRs matches in the town’s master prepare, which calls for preserving rural character. 

Resident Paul McKenna examine a letter aloud, increasing the concern of big businesses obtaining up properties to transform them into STRs, but the scheduling board failed to respond. 

Borelli questioned the proposed STR definition enabling up to 15 individuals. He stated that’s like a motel. 

At a person issue, Ohlson responded to the flurry of opinions by expressing that any one who want to get a handle on what the arranging board is up to must run for the open seats. Ohlson and Cribbe are up for re-election 

“Even yours certainly failed to get signed up in time,” claimed Ohlson, introducing persons can however operate for preparing board as produce-ins.

“Be a part of us and take us in the route you assume the town desires to go with STRs,” he told the audience.

Administrative assistant Kim Cyr reminded the organizing board that the selectmen had rescinded a stop-and-desist letter to STR homeowners in Eidelweiss.

Ohlson, who is also on the zoning board, stated this indicates for him that an approaching ZBA assembly this month will be a great deal shorter because the ZBA won’t have to deal with 49 STR appeals. 





Leave a Reply